Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6-2412eg (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2AE0
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121218
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '18 at 10:56
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 81 1-Core 43.2 2-Core 95.1 48% 73.1 Pts	4-Core 88.8 8-Core 97 12% 92.9 Pts	64-Core 95.2 6% 95.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1B0A 90BE) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.63 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.91 2% 2.18 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 0.09 1% 1.98 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 44 47 47 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 49.2 62% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 69%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 122GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 78 77 73 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 72 Write 71 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 75.8 49% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 51%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 1GB 309 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 5151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Read 19 Write 4.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.9 9% 8.53 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 6%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 0727 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 6.8 6.8 6.1 6.8 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.35% Terrible	Read 5.7 Write 1 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 6.1 4% 3.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.35% Great: 14%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 401 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 342GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 30 30 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 27.7 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 30.4 38% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 130 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.9 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

HP p6-2412eg

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)