Today's hottest deals

Biostar A780L3C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A780L3C  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 265-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 58.6
40% 56 Pts
4-Core 60.7
8-Core 88.9
9% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 89.6
6% 89.6 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Biostar(1565 0017) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1
2% 1 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 26 31 15 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 17.8
Write 16.3
Mixed 35
SusWrite 23.9
18% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 43%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
22GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 23 24 19 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 18.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 22.6
26% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A780L3C Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A780L3C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback