Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 11:56
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 270
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 897
88% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,141
71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 59.8
49% 62.2 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 52.1
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 196 79 30 108 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 410
Write 396
Mixed 320
SusWrite 130
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 9.4
92% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 168
140% 205 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 88%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
717GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 135 128 135 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 104
Write 113
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 130
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 113%
ADATA HD710 1TB
731GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 38
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 39.5
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback