Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '18 at 20:54
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 642
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38
33% 36.6 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 39
Splatting 37.3
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37 120G 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 233 23 28 17 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 496
Write 392
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 55.8
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 7.7
10% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback