Acer Aspire E5-574G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-574G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Zoro_SL
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151223
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 14:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 69
2-Core 126
57% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 187
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Acer(1025 100D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 7.41
5% 6.68 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 7.57
Splatting 1.91
4% 5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.3 4.6 4.1 4 5.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 805GB
557GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 30 33 25 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 8.7
Write 47.9
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 27.2
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-574G Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-574G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback