bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory52.5 GB free of 72 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 09:13
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 152
57% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 553
51% 428 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 118GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 26 39 41 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 93.5
Write 91.8
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 37.2
18% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 10
39% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 178
115% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 376GB
67GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 26 24 23 24 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 95.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 25
17% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 10.1
38% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 183
117% 132 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 66%
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
234GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 44 52 43 41 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
Read 96.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 99
SusWrite 42.6
19% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 11.6
42% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 178
115% 132 MB/s
Qnap iSCSI Storage 161GB
148GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 46 47 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 46.7
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 43.9
39% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 7
1,226% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 72GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 36.2
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback