Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro12,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E43C1C25D4880AD6
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 16:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 157
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 250
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 013F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 0.09
8% 6.81 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 14.3
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Aura SSD 480GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 1.7 150 9.3 9.4 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 495
Write 379
Mixed 186
SusWrite 56.8
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 12.2
62% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 27.8
62% 129 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 750GB
183GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 45.8
Write 50.7
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 54
61% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4544464132333241324D412D4A442D46 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro12,1 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback