Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 23:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 225
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 586
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 155 156 153 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 176
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 151
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 107%
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
4GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 11
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 10.1
16% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
52% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 9%
ST316002 1A 160GB
29GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.9
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 24.6
33% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-038.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback