bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory4.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 22:29
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 63.9
37% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 81.6
8-Core 73.1
11% 77.3 Pts
64-Core 55.8
4% 55.8 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 550GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 46 39 38 36 33 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.6% Very poor
Read 54.8
Write 50.1
Mixed 55
SusWrite 39.2
11% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 9.6
47% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 22.5
17% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 80%
Virtual HD 30GB
23GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.3% Very poor
Read 49.2
Write 42.7
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 14.4
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 3.3
694% 5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.1 6.1 2.5 7.5 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 15.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 4.4
14% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
null MHz
1024, 13312 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.6
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.1
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback