Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 13:50
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 85
2-Core 172
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 672
60% 506 Pts
64-Core 1290
80% 1290 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 171
Parallax 175
127% 167 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 162
Splatting 116
107% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1110 847 858 861 860 859 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,903
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,674
SusWrite 899
364% 1,621 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 65.6
225% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 670
DQ Mixed 858
627% 824 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 237%
Great: 284%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
133GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,792
Write 4,336
Mixed 5,521
1,300% 5,883 MB/s
4K Read 397
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 265
1,061% 296 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 851
652% 893 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 158 152 154 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 142
Write 156
Mixed 77
SusWrite 157
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
212% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 121%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 144
Mixed 73
SusWrite 116
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 150 156 156 154 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 85
SusWrite 151
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
279% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 94%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 187 188 186 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 186
Write 163
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 185
202% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 32.9
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $540
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback