Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 635
61% 504 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2319 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 61.1
58% 67.4 fps
MRender 77.8
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 71.7
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN 25SATA01M 120 120GB
11GB free
Firmware: 20150529
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 61 101 162 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 426
Write 3.8
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 89.8
31% 147 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 3.8
DQ Mixed 0.3
23% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 70%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 71 16 30 115 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 299
Write 194
Mixed 199
SusWrite 66.9
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 23.1
93% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 114
115% 184 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7
24GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 92.5
Mixed 97.3
130% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.7
238% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback