Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 185 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 358 46% 349 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 30.5 27% 29.6 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 32 Splatting 31 27% 33 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 51 49 38 38 50 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 417 Write 51.2 Mixed 91 SusWrite 41 32% 150 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 15.7 64% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 29.7 DQ Mixed 20.3 28% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 55%
MM0500EBKAE 500GB 235 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 466GB free Firmware: HPG3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 109 95 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 111 Write 108 Mixed 66 SusWrite 107 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-442.A00LF 4x2GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	325x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	308x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	61x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214