Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Socket 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 73.1 42% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 266 23% 197 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 959GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 157GB free Firmware: 3.34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 470 485 486 486 480 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	103% Outstanding	Read 1,101 Write 891 Mixed 1,078 SusWrite 476 199% 886 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 16.2 59% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 230 182% 253 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 172%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 288GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 332 323 317 334 303 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	Read 1,331 Write 997 Mixed 1,094 SusWrite 313 208% 934 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 23.8 78% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 132 128% 201 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 168%
StoreJet Transcend 4TB 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 483GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 25 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 22.3 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 24.3 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 4x16GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 24 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 44.6 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 41.7 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.2 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM