Today's hottest deals

Alienware 15 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware 15 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 15 R2
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160707
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 02 '16 at 06:14
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 155
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 457
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 0708) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 6.56
5% 23.2 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 13.6
7% 8.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
268GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 485
Write 368
Mixed 392
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 31
107% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 87.7
108% 193 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86%
Great: 131%
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PND9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 425
Write 286
Mixed 342
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 7.78
43% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.9
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 7.77
12% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 R2 Builds (Compare 908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 15 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback