Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T7 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V12.1
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170213
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 16:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 272
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 703
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7708) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2377 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 63
Parallax 51.1
44% 56.1 fps
MRender 78
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 71.3
56% 68 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,035
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,198
319% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.6
234% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 190
209% 354 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 241%
Great: 236%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 130
Write 113
Mixed 111
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.19
73% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V12.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback