Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 04 '16 at 06:03
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 162
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 348
39% 305 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 30
Parallax 55.7
34% 42.5 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 40
Splatting 37.3
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 250GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
Read 353
Write 54.6
Mixed 94.1
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 6.85
65% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 16.9
41% 91 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 60.6
Mixed 60.8
46% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.26
97% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 0707 GU512303EP0202 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback