Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 19:18
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 36.5
1-Core 58.6
2-Core 99.5
37% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 201
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 86GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 99 129 136 133 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 348
Write 149
Mixed 89
SusWrite 107
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 4.5
23% 8.47 MB/s
DQ Read 5.8
DQ Write 6.7
DQ Mixed 7.5
5% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 51%
Vmware Virtual disk 32GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 66 96 82 35 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 249
Write 149
Mixed 136
SusWrite 62.3
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.5
695% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB
48GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 50 64 49 36 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 210
Write 115
Mixed 179
SusWrite 51.1
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.6
739% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 17.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback