HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '16 at 13:41
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 143
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 212
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
HP(103C 179D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 4.25
4% 4.85 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Platinet 120GB 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 429
Write 399
Mixed 434
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 4.28
98% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 5.32
43% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback