Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 16:37
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$25
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 175
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 162
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.6 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17.3
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Platinet 120GB 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 59 65 63 66 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 378
Write 288
Mixed 128
SusWrite 88.1
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 3.8
52% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 18
37% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 75%
Toshiba HDWJ110 1TB
6GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 74 87 56 41 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 89.6
Write 92.4
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 71.4
50% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback