Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 06:57
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 130
2-Core 264
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 752
74% 605 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 155
Parallax 134
121% 146 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 171
Splatting 118
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
362GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 61 66 61 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 79.6
Write 71.4
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 63.6
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS543216L9SA02 160GB
148GB free
Firmware: FB2AC50F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 62.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 62
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 35%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
5GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 11.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 16.7
17% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 9%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
224GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 79.6
Write 56.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 75.7
85% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback