Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 16:54
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$194
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 21.4
2-Core 40.8
31% 41.9 Pts
4-Core 79.5
8-Core 126
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 63
Parallax 101
41% 71.4 fps
MRender 91.4
Gravity 84.7
Splatting 93.6
74% 89.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 23 4.9 14 22 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.3% Excellent
Read 254
Write 138
Mixed 174
SusWrite 28.8
111% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 7.4
891% 3.33 MB/s
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB
63GB free
Firmware: KF100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 75
Write 78.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 77.8
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 2TB
856GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 57 42 39 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 84.2
Write 41.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 48.1
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 120%
Maxtor 6L200P0 204GB
92GB free
Firmware: BAH41G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 26.3
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 27.6
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 34%
Marvell Raid VD 500GB
429GB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 118 120 119 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 106
Write 127
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 117
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback