Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 20:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 233
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 603
68% 535 Pts
64-Core 874
54% 874 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
MSI(1462 328E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 75.4
Parallax 66.1
62% 72.7 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 71.6
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NFS011SA356-6007200 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 444 438 447 433 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 444
Mixed 400
SusWrite 381
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 31.1
124% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 46.3
89% 172 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 91%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 30.7
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback