Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 265
93% 165 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 950
89% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 206
Parallax 198
150% 196 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 185
Splatting 135
123% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1424 1237 1238 1192 1172 1168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,187
Write 1735
Mixed 798
SusWrite 1,239
332% 1,490 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 77.7
274% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 1,001
DQ Mixed 1,035
790% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 296%
Great: 302%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 485 485 491 492 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 483
Mixed 411
SusWrite 488
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 54.3
192% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
410GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 491 492 491 492 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 487
Mixed 416
SusWrite 491
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 54.7
193% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
410GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 492 491 491 491 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 481
Mixed 415
SusWrite 491
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 52.5
187% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.6 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 18.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.3
15% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 66.7
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 51.6
167% 58.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 28.8
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 46.4
86% 46.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 150%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,484
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback