MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7B92
Motherboard	MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds)
Memory	123 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '19 at 17:48
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 75% 139 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 933 83% 700 Pts	64-Core 2,548 158% 2,548 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.4% Very good	Lighting 97.5 Reflection 107 Parallax 101 80% 102 fps	MRender 93.1 Gravity 91.2 Splatting 95 76% 93.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 564GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 141 146 136 135 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 451 Write 324 Mixed 421 SusWrite 134 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 29.4 102% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 157 138% 199 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 375%
Amd-raid Array 5 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 292% 3TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 165 176 163 153 158 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	104% Outstanding	Read 803 Write 1,823 Mixed 756 SusWrite 162 201% 886 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 40.5 137% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 423 DQ Write 441 DQ Mixed 445 331% 436 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 441%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 216GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 395 394 395 395 395 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 444 Mixed 392 SusWrite 395 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 43.1 144% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 206 154% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 222GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 395 394 395 395 395 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 443 Mixed 391 SusWrite 395 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 44.7 146% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 207 155% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 494 502 503 503 503 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 464 Write 500 Mixed 436 SusWrite 501 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 72 4K Mixed 27.8 100% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 159 135% 191 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 422%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 85 81 76 76 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 117 Write 112 Mixed 114 SusWrite 79.2 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1.3 260% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 190%
Amd-raid Array 3 16TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 9.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 95 117 118 106 96 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 271 Write 210 Mixed 168 SusWrite 110 140% 190 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 2.2 594% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 230%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	MC Read 58.8 MC Write 58.1 MC Mixed 53.1 162% 56.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 25.3 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	32x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	31x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	20x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	11x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x

RAM
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 135%, 67 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,611

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16