MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B92
Motherboard	MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds)
Memory	121.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 66.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 71% 130 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 855 76% 643 Pts	64-Core 2,340 145% 2,340 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.5% Very good	Lighting 93.8 Reflection 102 Parallax 86.4 76% 94 fps	MRender 90.4 Gravity 88.1 Splatting 91 74% 89.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 584GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 85 87 90 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 420 Write 330 Mixed 394 SusWrite 87.3 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 36.1 127% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 165 138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 375%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 216GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 375 376 381 380 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 441 Write 423 Mixed 387 SusWrite 378 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 42.2 137% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 269 207% 282 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 222GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 375 375 380 379 379 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 430 Mixed 386 SusWrite 377 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 42.3 136% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 263 204% 277 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 91 89 94 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 459 Write 506 Mixed 452 SusWrite 92 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 36.6 139% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 175 144% 199 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 422%
Amd-raid Array 5 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 292% 3TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4406 4591 4503 4404 4490 4257 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	441% Outstanding	Read 1,994 Write 4,372 Mixed 1,753 SusWrite 4,442 716% 3,140 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 60.6 213% 79.3 MB/s	DQ Read 566 DQ Write 525 DQ Mixed 553 413% 548 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 441% Great: 441%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 64 75 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 92 Write 89 Mixed 93 SusWrite 69.2 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.3 252% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 190%
Amd-raid Array 3 16TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 10TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 84 92 85 89 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 295 Write 149 Mixed 170 SusWrite 88 130% 175 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 1.8 549% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 230%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 58.8 MC Write 58 MC Mixed 52.9 162% 56.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 23.8 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	32x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	31x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	20x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	11x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x

RAM
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 135%, 67 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,611

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $129	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16