| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3358-A2 |
| Memory | 28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180803 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 11 '19 at 08:03 |
| Run Duration | 194 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
|
54.2%
Above average
|
60% 112 Pts
|
54% 453 Pts
|
75% 1,215 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
54.9%
Above average
|
57% 74.6 fps
|
52% 64.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 437 308 295 294 292 MB/s
|
92.6%
Outstanding
|
93% 414 MB/s
|
122% 42.9 MB/s
|
256% 343 MB/s
|
|
FTS PRAID EP400i 1TB
496GB free
Firmware: 4.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 138 139 139 138 138 MB/s
|
284%
Outstanding
|
591% 2,640 MB/s
|
379% 112 MB/s
|
340% 460 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR8N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.5%
Below average
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
32% 11 GB/s
|
24% 163 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples | 10x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 5x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |