Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87M-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 11:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 221
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 578
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 43.1
30% 37.7 fps
MRender 46.7
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 34
33% 41.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3SMD2MSPT240GB 240GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 269 202 293 299 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 472
Write 302
Mixed 260
SusWrite 274
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 28.9
112% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 164
134% 186 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
445GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 97 97 94 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 178
Write 176
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 96.2
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 103%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
231GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.1 3.3 3.2 3 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Read 3
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3
4% 3.08 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-036.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 15.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback