Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 09 '19 at 17:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 849E) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.6% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 81.5
55% 70.8 fps
MRender 77.2
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 48.8
54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PB22-JS3 TH 64GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM19D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 90 102 121 114 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 205
Write 50.7
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 101
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 8.5
44% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 2.8
DQ Mixed 5.6
5% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
2GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.6 4.2 5.3 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 11.9
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.4
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3P1333LV2G OCZ3G1333LV2G OCZ3P1333LV2G OCZ3G1333LV2G 8GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback