Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 23:02
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 98
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 621
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
PNY(196E 100A) 3GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1780 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 72
Parallax 85.2
43% 70.2 fps
MRender 79.1
Gravity 64
Splatting 59.7
54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 128GB 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 130 69 44 40 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 282
Write 239
Mixed 223
SusWrite 69.9
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 13.2
77% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 1.1
40% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
9GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 458
Mixed 435
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 41.3
145% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
56GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,118
Write 930
Mixed 961
223% 1,003 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 69.2
220% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 580
426% 560 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
130GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 64 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 53.1
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 64
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 24.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 46.2
87% 46.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 3 60 44.9" 1280 720 GSM760E 32LG6000
Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback