Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LE (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120824
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '16 at 17:13
Run Duration	376 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 166 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 325 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.09% Terrible	Lighting 8.43 Reflection 7.69 Parallax 8.53 7% 8.22 fps	MRender 8.57 Gravity 7.77 Splatting 10.6 8% 8.98 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.09% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 71690536 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2803 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 154856893 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6091 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1526 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 56 521273372 (C2) HDA temperature 28 44 47244640284 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 30 71690536 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -81866371622518 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3133752396 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3670315871	72.6% Very good	Read 124 Write 130 Mixed 118 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.61 118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 88%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1051 (03) Spinup time 140 137 3983 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7343 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22944 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2242 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 348 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7343 (C2) HDA temperature 113 92 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58% Above average	Read 105 Write 97.6 Mixed 100 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.27 85% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 113GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 97 149315564 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6164 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 353449397 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14171 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3373 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 51 505217054 (C2) HDA temperature 30 49 47244640286 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 76 69 50105544 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	39.4% Below average	Read 68.7 Write 68.5 Mixed 66.7 51% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.36 86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 42%
Linux File-CD Gadget 16GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 13GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 4.09 Mixed 6.13 9% 9.01 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.72 45% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB 7,477 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 16 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	103x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	86x
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	44x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	56x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	26x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
Team-Elite-1600 Kingston 9905584-027.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 53%, 16 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369