Today's hottest deals

Asus X550JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JX
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151031
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 13:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 60
2-Core 187
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 239
26% 203 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 178D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 15.8
15% 16.5 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 16
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37 120G 120GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 169 210 211 224 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 300
Write 196
Mixed 177
SusWrite 206
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 15.9
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 91.5
91% 141 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 72%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
147GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 85 81 95 91 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 39.5
Write 47.2
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 90.4
36% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1867, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback