Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150323
Uptime	12.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 17:43
Run Duration	471 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 58.7 2-Core 117 52% 83.8 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 295 30% 245 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 83.6 Reflection 109 Parallax 180 68% 124 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 170 Splatting 121 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 263 140 180 82 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64% Good	Read 411 Write 330 Mixed 318 SusWrite 161 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 28.1 94% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 172 133% 182 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 284GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 216 118 206 157 277 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	66% Good	Read 428 Write 321 Mixed 348 SusWrite 189 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 29.7 97% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 90.9 DQ Mixed 179 127% 165 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 210GB free Firmware: CC4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 110 68 110 60 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 113 Write 84 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 88.3 66% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 113%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 436GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 82 51 85 45 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 112 Write 106 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 66.6 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 565GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 81 50 82 44 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 83 Write 78.5 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 64.7 52% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 130 79 130 71 129 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 162 Write 67.8 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 103 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 99%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 298GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 115 64 112 59 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 170 Write 168 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 89.2 162% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 98%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 190GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 82 46 83 44 83 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 90 Write 86.7 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 64.3 101% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 60%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 39GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 15 23 12 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 97.3 Write 105 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 18.8 99% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.6 148% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 85%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 25 41 23 42 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 110 Write 118 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 33.5 104% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 48%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 8TB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 538GB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 9.5 16 8.8 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.38% Terrible	Read 26.5 Write 23.8 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 12.7 29% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.38% Great: 98%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 162GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 15 23 12 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 180 Write 174 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 18.9 147% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 134% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 82%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 465GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 25 41 23 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 85.8 Write 101 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 33.8 91% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 48%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 4.8 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Read 5.2 Write 10 Mixed 4 SusWrite 1.1 7% 5.08 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 85%
WD My Book 1170 3TB 622 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 306GB free, PID 1170 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 9.3 16 8.8 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 24.3 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 12.6 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 58%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 323GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 14 23 12 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	35% Below average	Read 154 Write 148 Mixed 104 SusWrite 19.9 135% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.5 145% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 85%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 432GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 40 25 41 23 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 156 Write 152 Mixed 101 SusWrite 34.4 142% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 210% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 83%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 549GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 40 25 41 23 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 112 Write 114 Mixed 85 SusWrite 33.9 112% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 2.1 246% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 17 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.8 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	441x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	215x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	48x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	29x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 66%, 6,389 samples	22x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $625

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16