MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190628
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '19 at 13:48
Run Duration	375 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 81.8 1-Core 146 2-Core 294 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 842 85% 690 Pts	64-Core 1,049 65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 16.8 16% 17.5 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.7 16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE220S 256GB 2,678 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0328C SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 323 172 369 375 287 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 2,040 Write 336 Mixed 139 SusWrite 298 150% 703 MB/s	4K Read 57.2 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 68 252% 91.1 MB/s	DQ Read 818 DQ Write 833 DQ Mixed 472 452% 708 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 279%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 5TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 41 30 34 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.42% Terrible	Read 99.7 Write 112 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 39.6 19% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 0.7 6% 3.43 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 6.3 DQ Mixed 2.2 2% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.42% Great: 17%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 150GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 374 364 235 266 367 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 396 Write 401 Mixed 409 SusWrite 313 86% 380 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 32 107% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 255 192% 259 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 991GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 96 90 75 81 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 83 Write 44 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 86 48% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 991GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 96 91 79 84 95 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 59 Write 39.5 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 87.4 41% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 408GB free Firmware: 0711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 26 23 20 21 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 90.5 Write 12 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 22.3 28% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 95% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 398GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 22 18 19 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 114 Write 13.7 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 20.6 34% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 97%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 892GB free Firmware: 0342 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 143 102% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.7 252% 2.83 MB/s

Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 892GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 11 11 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 140 Write 18.2 Mixed 27 SusWrite 12.5 36% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 11 11 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 127 Write 21.8 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 11.9 34% 47 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 80.3 Write 25.5 Mixed 32 SusWrite 11.9 28% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 92%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 27 15 15 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29% Poor	Read 79.2 Write 20.7 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 21.7 26% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 24 18 19 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 69 Write 18.8 Mixed 21 SusWrite 22.5 24% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1TB free Firmware: 0225 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 26 20 21 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 75 Write 19 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 24.6 27% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 68%
SanDisk SDSSDHII240G 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 210GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 39 28 31 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	108% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 213 Mixed 136 SusWrite 37.4 188% 146 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 16.4 1,362% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 19.9 1,656% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 176%
ASMT 2115 5TB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 41 31 33 46 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	58% Above average	Read 108 Write 159 Mixed 78 SusWrite 39.5 129% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 1 407% 4.2 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 1.1 410% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 33.5 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 32.5 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $179Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,934x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,536x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,297x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	765x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	620x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	597x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	501x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	380x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	368x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	431x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	268x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	231x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $992

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16