Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD4  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 21:32
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 97.2
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 176
75% 124 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 454
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50% Above average
Lighting 63
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 77.1
51% 66.5 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 51.4
47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 355 244 198 180 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 381
Write 384
Mixed 318
SusWrite 242
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 36.1
128% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 254
192% 258 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81%
Great: 134%
Synology iSCSI Storage 16GB
9GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 78 76 76 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 80.8
Write 72.3
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 74.9
17% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 7.9
26% 8.03 MB/s
DQ Read 55
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 13.7
16% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
138GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 120 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 119
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 109%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$65
138GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 80 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 40
Write 38.3
Mixed 28
SusWrite 81.9
34% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 54%
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
62GB free
Firmware: 2D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 47.3
Write 53.2
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 39.1
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 32%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$65
173GB free
Firmware: 4C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 25 26 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 79
Write 65.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 30.2
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 49.7
80% 49.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD4 Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback