Today's hottest deals

Asus Maximus III Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus III Formula  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101215
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 06:09
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$199
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 82.3
46% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 220
23% 186 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Nvidia(10DE 089C) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 3.3
8% 4.43 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 10
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$119
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 169 160 191 181 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 200
Write 202
Mixed 164
SusWrite 179
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 18.9
61% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 138
118% 172 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus III Formula Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Maximus III Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback