Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 159 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 316 41% 308 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 18.6 15% 18.4 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 16.8 14% 17 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$118 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 122 96 108 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 401 Write 215 Mixed 244 SusWrite 108 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 29 85% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 63 DQ Mixed 69.3 86% 160 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 111%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,977 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 7GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 67 69 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 54.2 Write 61.9 Mixed 29.4 SusWrite 68 73% 53.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB 30,824 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.5% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $118Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	2x

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $197