Performance Results

Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 100%
Workstation 77%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 669
74% 582 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 196
Parallax 118
94% 143 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 120
Splatting 108
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2215 1172 888 893 884 894 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,630
Write 2,438
Mixed 2,364
SusWrite 1,158
482% 2,147 MB/s
4K Read 80.8
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 110
360% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1424
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 1,196
876% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 339%
Great: 429%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$118
158GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 484 485 483 485 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 482
Mixed 322
SusWrite 475
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 40.3
153% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 31.2
107% 235 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
224GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 118 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 76.9
Write 28.4
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 113
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 31.9
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 28.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback