Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190730
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 23:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 243
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 750
74% 607 Pts
64-Core 1,322
82% 1,322 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Lighting 79.4
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 70.4
65% 76.8 fps
MRender 77.2
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 65
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPED1K750GA 750GB
454GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1194 1254 1258 1280 1274 1280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 1,402
Write 1,337
Mixed 1,378
SusWrite 1,257
303% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 147
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 139
468% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 817
618% 833 MB/s
Poor: 316%
This bench: 316%
Great: 535%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
480GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 463 463 461 459 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 475
Mixed 386
SusWrite 457
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 49.9
172% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 367
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 117%
Great: 130%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 189 187 184 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 195
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 189
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 188 201 186 200 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 200
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 193
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
60GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 24 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 208
Write 25
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 26.3
87% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 9.8
728% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 11.1
1,011% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$263
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 22.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $799
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback