Asrock H97 Performance

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H97 Performance (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180307
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$130 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 92.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 225 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 569 59% 474 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.7% Average	Lighting 69.7 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 67.4 57% 69.2 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 0.09 33% 46.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 322GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 682 663 646 654 686 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,668 Write 1,261 Mixed 413 SusWrite 691 224% 1,008 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 41.8 198% 87.8 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 605 DQ Mixed 540 393% 500 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 223%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 678GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 358GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.3 5.8 5.7 5.7 6.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	119% Outstanding	Read 1,530 Write 971 Mixed 621 SusWrite 7 172% 782 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 29.8 110% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 461 DQ Write 597 DQ Mixed 559 414% 539 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 184%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB 2,097 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJAONS04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 80 81 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 83.4 Write 80.6 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 81.5 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 843GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 125 127 131 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 139 Write 84.8 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 127 67% 93 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 145 148 151 151 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 136 Write 139 Mixed 16.1 SusWrite 147 79% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 665GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 88 89 92 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 85.6 Write 88.6 Mixed 20 SusWrite 89 51% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 624GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 111 114 115 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 124 Write 103 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 109 65% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 107%
USB3.0 high speed 240GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 82GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 98 85 86 85 86 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 253 Write 247 Mixed 242 SusWrite 112 284% 214 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 24.3 1,795% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 25.2 1,838% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 146%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 2,445 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	61.9% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 22.1 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97 Performance Builds (Compare 506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Performance - $171

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	97x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	85x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	71x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	39x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	16x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	13x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 1,884 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	16x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $819

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406