Acer Aspire E1-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 125
62% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 200
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.86 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.43
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$40
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 203 199 184 175 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 483
Write 449
Mixed 323
SusWrite 200
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 33.4
122% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 272
217% 303 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 105%
USB3.0 high speed 240GB
221GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 27.6
Write 21.6
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 24.7
33% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.2
230% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback