ADD TO PC
BUILD

Aaeon BOXER-6640M

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Aaeon BOXER-6640M (all builds)
Motherboard	AAEON PBA-SKS03
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170731
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '19 at 18:25
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700TE 121 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 152 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 412 44% 349 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2015) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Lighting 6.87 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 6.91 6% 7.83 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 6.17 Splatting 13.6 8% 9.12 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Innodisk Corp. - mSATA 3ME3 256GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: S17411 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 199 186 167 204 181 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.2% Below average	Read 273 Write 225 Mixed 207 SusWrite 181 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 5 44% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 15.3 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 22.7 29% 48 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 37%
WD Red 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$150 1,952 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 875GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 87 87 89 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 87.8 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GSH64V1H 1x8GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback