Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	6.96% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS) 113 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 37.6 1-Core 53.7 2-Core 106 37% 65.6 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 195 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 55 51 62 66 54 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	6.96% Terrible	Read 41 Write 79.6 Mixed 95.8 SusWrite 54.5 16% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2 6% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 6.96% Great: 77%
Qemu HARDDISK 11GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 10GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 54 53 52 48 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.87% Terrible	Read 94.8 Write 76.1 Mixed 124 SusWrite 51.2 20% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2 6% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.87% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 11.6 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 118%

UFO

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 112%

UFO

CPU
Xeon (Cascadelake)IntelBench 62%, 31 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2640 v4IntelBench 69%, 647 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
Hat VirtIO 86GBRedBench 49%, 89 samples	1x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $909

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16