bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory34.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 13:33
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 178
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 470
47% 385 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 49 50 49 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 134
Write 80.1
Mixed 103
SusWrite 49.6
20% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 31.7
147% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 66
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 41.3
38% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 137GB
69GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 26 29 27 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 128
SusWrite 27.5
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 20.7
69% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 64.2
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 65.3
49% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
522GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 49 47 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 128
Write 109
Mixed 105
SusWrite 48.5
22% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 35.9
147% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 65.2
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 54.7
44% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
985GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 5.9 6.8 4.4 8.9 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 68%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
193GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 22 27 16 36 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 79.4
Write 40
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 23.8
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 31745 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 46.7
MC Mixed 42.2
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback