Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '19 at 00:00
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 73 2-Core 137 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 469 44% 364 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3013 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 93.8 Parallax 85.6 85% 94.5 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 92.8 Splatting 80.6 75% 93.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 454 418 402 425 407 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 556 Write 557 Mixed 534 SusWrite 421 116% 517 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 43.9 139% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 98.4 DQ Mixed 174 147% 222 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 63GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 123 123 120 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 347 Write 106 Mixed 153 SusWrite 117 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 16.8 65% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 48.7 DQ Mixed 66.6 57% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 19GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 100 96 78 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 110 Write 93.9 Mixed 78.4 SusWrite 83.9 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 751GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 158 161 160 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 146 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 159 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 109%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	9.12% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 16.4 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 16.6 22% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.1 71% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.12% Great: 15%
Hitachi HTS721010G9SA00 100GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 57GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 39.1 Write 38.3 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 38.9 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 17%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 139GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 26.5 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 28.4 36% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 16.6 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 13.7 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16