Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160630
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '16 at 00:39
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 676
64% 531 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4501
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 6.66
2% 4.33 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 6.03
Splatting 14.1
8% 9.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 477
Write 329
Mixed 334
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 13.1
98% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 14.7
36% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
2TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 131
Write 196
Mixed 142
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 5.24
4K Mixed 0.65
202% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 157
Mixed 146
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.34
110% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%
Sandisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
12GB free
Firmware: 1.27
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 12.3
Mixed 16.7
14% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.26
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 1.33
440% 3.11 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 1,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback