Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180409
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 02:05
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 528
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.7% Good
Lighting 77.8
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 69.7
63% 77.3 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 75.6
58% 71 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
I-flashdisk K8 64GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0831A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 66 65 60 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
Read 418
Write 74.5
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 65.7
35% 164 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 6.9
67% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 52.2
47% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 61%
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB
156GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 79 78 70 78 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 110
Write 97.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 69
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 73%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 39.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 40.9
29% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 10.3
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback