bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel NUC5CPYB
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '19 at 12:59
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 41.9 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 39.6 23% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 38.4 8-Core 43.1 5% 40.8 Pts	64-Core 39.2 2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2060) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 2.38 1% 2.01 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.26 2% 1.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AGI256G27AI168 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 244 266 293 293 327 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 107 Write 94.3 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 286 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 8.5 34% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.7 DQ Write 16.4 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 89%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7 9,864 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 25GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 42 19 17 18 18 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 77 Write 56.4 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 27.6 72% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.5 167% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 4.8 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,027x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,573x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	936x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,044x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16