Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 19:27
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 335
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
MSI(1462 2710) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 22.5
14% 18.8 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 18.8
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 314 316 337 359 316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 467
Write 348
Mixed 246
SusWrite 329
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 27.9
117% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 124
128% 213 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
838GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 75 110 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 145
Write 147
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 90.3
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 1,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback