Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 17:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 178
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 267
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 41.5
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 38.6
34% 37.5 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 37.2
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 86 57 56 60 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 427
Write 344
Mixed 106
SusWrite 79.3
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 26.2
102% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 103
100% 165 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$53
226GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 88 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 87.5
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 86.7
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback