Today's hottest deals

HP p6-2003w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2003w  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 17:55
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 42.7
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 55.7
28% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 61.2
8-Core 67.5
8% 64.3 Pts
64-Core 67.1
4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.45 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate 600 Pro 240GB-$199
140GB free
Firmware: B690
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 206 215 205 166 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 234
Write 223
Mixed 202
SusWrite 205
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 20.8
69% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 169
125% 165 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 64 57 56 50 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 108
Write 118
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 69.7
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.1
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2003w Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p6-2003w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback